Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]All good points. Can't and don't want to disagree with any of them. Bottom line - clients want digital - and I have to continuously practice with digital equipment both hardware and software to give them the best quality; just as I had to do with film. And work flow has simply moved to digital. When I do shoot film it immediately becomes digitized in any event. Even to get commercial lab prints they've all gone digital prints. So unless I find myself out of work it feels like I have little choice. Regards, George Lottermoser george@imagist.com On Jan 11, 2007, at 12:14 PM, Alan Magayne-Roshak wrote: > Speaking of curmudgeons, I don't think I could ever have a digital > as my > with-me-all-the-time camera. It just doesn't have the gravitas of > film; I > wouldn't feel like I'm getting a real picture, just a (admittedly > incredible) simulation. As I think you said once, that piece of > film was > THERE, on the scene, and that is special to me. > > I used my digital ELPH a lot after I first bought it, but now I > hardly ever > touch it, or look at the stuff I took with it. It seems a lot of > bother to > have to boot up a computer to view images; even if I haven't been > able to > make prints, I can get enjoyment looking at the proof sheets or > flipping > through slide sleeves.