Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Aw, nuts! :-) OK, my example was wrong, but I still think my hypothesis might have something to it. I don't have an M8 (yet?), so I'll have to rely on you Early Adopters for evidence. As Elmer Fudd might have said, "I think there's a wot of infwawed in that photogwaph." Now excuse me while I go hide in the woods with the cwazy wabbit. --Peter Dialog between Peter & Steve: >careful now... :-) > > > > In Steve's picture of Tom, > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/barbour/M8candles/tom.jpg.html > > notice that the the pendant around his neck is sharper than his > > eyes. This is even more apparent in the full-size version. > > Assuming Steve focused on one of Tom's eyes > >don't assume that Peter... you may assume that I focussed on the >pendant, and you would be right.. :-) > >(it was too dark for the eyes...)