Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Rei The photo magazines make a lot of money from their industry advertisers. Do you really think they would chance that just to be honest? Rei Shinozuka wrote: >(link is below) > >reasonable capsule review, though ocasionally misses the point >such as "the camera stores the selected (or automatically >chosen) shutter speed in that EXIF data, but strangely, >aperture information is not recorded even when using >the latest lenses" -- gee whiz, there is no coupling that >transmits the aperture ring setting... > >the review also discusses the drama of the IR magenta cast, >the UV filter "fix" and so on. > >most interstingly they give the camera high marks for >"stellar low-light performance" where tina's side-by-side >tests were not so complimentary. > >-rei > >-----Original Message----- >From: Google Alerts <googlealerts-noreply@google.com> >To: rei.shinozuka@gmail.com >Subject: Google Alert - "leica camera" >Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:46:21 -0800 (PST) > >Camera Test: Leica M8 >Popular Photography Magazine - USA >By Michael J. McNamara. Leica camera owners are a special breed that >casual >photographers can't understand. For the uninitiated, the ... ><http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/3535/camera-test-leica-m8.html> > >This as-it-happens Google Alert is brought to you by Google... >- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >Remove this Google Alert: >http://www.google.com/alerts/remove?s=EAAAADyjTqrxULea30gROdSresM&hl=en > >Create another Google Alert: >http://www.google.com/alerts?hl=en > >Sign in to manage your alerts: >http://www.google.com/alerts/manage?hl=en >-rei > >----- End forwarded message ----- > > >