Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/12/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] High ISOs Comparison
From: telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr)
Date: Thu Dec 7 18:14:39 2006
References: <20061206214243.BXP45425@ms03.lnh.mail.rcn.net> <A60E7CFF-A5DD-4A0E-BB3C-7324CEC5BBCA@comcast.net> <7.0.1.0.2.20061207080917.02807240@infoave.net> <43c3d48744166758eda769a953ddebaf@earthlink.net> <45782167.4010301@waltjohnson.com> <ekdhn2h0t93ippsdj85q38rn3628i0hdjr@4ax.com> <4578BCD2.2070801@waltjohnson.com>
On Dec 7, 2006, at 5:16 PM, Walt Johnson wrote:
> What if the Nikkormat with a 50mm f2.0 provided a better finished
> product than your M8?
I don't see why someone who is interested in a digital rangefinder
would care how a film SLR of any vintage or capabilities compares. A
more logical comparison would be a film SLR and a digital SLR and in
this comparison for me from viewing prints the digital SLR (DMR in my
case) has pretty much replaced the film SLR at ISO 400 and above. BTW
I do have a recently-CLA'd Nikkormat FTN with 50mm f/2 lens (also 50mm
f/1.4 AIS, 55mm f/2.8, 200mm f/4 and 300mm f/4.5 ED non-IF).
Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com
Replies:
Reply from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)
In reply to:
Message from larry.k at rcn.com (larry.k@rcn.com) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)
Message from xrogers at comcast.net (Clyde Rogers) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)
Message from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)