Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Apples and oranges completely. But you are comparing a FF CMOS chip to a non FF CCD chip. The Canon 24/1.4 looks like it has allot of falloff on the edges, even at 5.6. Of course seeing it on a screen and seeing in print are another story. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Filippone" Subject: RE: [Leica] High ISOs Comparison > In my monitor, on my computer...... > > The Canon far blows away the M8 at ASA 2500 / 3600 in the cropped images. > Not even close. > Ditto ASA 1250 > > The amount of "noise" in the M8 is significantly higher, however, the > sharpness favors the Leica. This could be the 24 F1.4 lens vs > the 21 F2.8 lens compromises..... The Leica lens could be just plain > sharper. > > In total, using the criteria of the total image, the Canon looks like a > "better" image maker in this comparison, for these light > levels and ASA. > > Are these cameras the same price? Ditto the lens prices (new, street > prices). Apples = Apples? > > BTW, the Canon 24 is a full 2 stops faster.....So at the same shutter > speed ( or hand holding speed), the Canon can work at 1/4 the > light..... still favors the Canon. > > > > Frank Filippone