Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Henning, thanks for the comments. See the inline remarks below. Henning Wulff wrote: > > Peter, > > There are a couple of issues here. The first is that neither picture has > a real focus. I probably agree on the whole. The building is actually the offices of (my wife's) law firm and I was up to pick her up on our way out for the evening - as ever I had stuffed a Leica in my pocket. This was only the second or third time I had been there since they moved in in the summer. As a result these are somewhat "grabbed" and pretty unofficial. Your eye kind of wanders all over without finding anything > to lock on. Rodger's building are all extremely mechano-complexo, so > that makes it hard, but you have to try and find simple, strong elements > that can carry the picture and not let your eye wander off the page. I was concerned that the complexity if the building and the low light would be as much of a detterent to this kind of photography, so I tried to hook on the guys in front left to give a sense of scale/perspective. The second picture was grabbed over a balcony. There was going to be a third of the sheep (yes, I mean it that is not a typo! :-), but I wasn't carrying a 90 with me so that went by the by. > > All that said, and partly for the above reasons, the second > (HousInterior.jpg) works better for me, because there is a bit more of a > focus. I like it because it's simpler! I also really like the pools of light reflected off the brushed steel surfaces, which I think is a real stength - and signature of - BW400CN. > > Thanks for showing. I'll always look at pictures of architecture. :-) > I've seen other pictures of this building, and yours add to the > understanding of that building. Any that you think particularly good? Again, thanks for the omments and advice. Peter