Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think criticism of the RD1 is fair enough as it is not perfect but from this user the criticism is not perhaps what you may expect. The thing I like:- The intuitive fast to use controls, a billion times better than the menu driven sh*te software available on all my other digital cameras - I suppose it makes the hardware cheaper if everything is menu driven. This really is a -massive- RD1 plus for me I consider unintuitive software unforgivable in 2006. The shortcoming:- poorly designed CV viewfinder/rangefinder which loses adjustment and needs a very precise eye position to see the shutter speed, but this is an all but identical piece to the CV Bessa, so those who appreciate that camera should not be bothered by this - it disappoints me though. The amusing:- lever wind :-) I am not in the least bothered by this one way or the other, I have been cocking my camera's shutter manually for over 40 years. I never took to motor winders or drives, anything that added a gram to the weight or a millimeter to the size of a camera just to wind the camera is totally unjustifiable to me, I am not a Sports pro. In fact if electrical cocking of the shutter on the RD1 had made it bigger or heavier that would be a big black mark to me. As a matter of interest in Sean Reid's excellent subscription review site he has several M8 investigations. In the investigation of the much discussed IR sensitivity of the M8 he draws attention to the fact that the RD1 is also quite IR sensitive though this was not noted in reviews at the time. Perhaps too much effort sneering at the lever wind to notice anything in the pictures? :-) Frank On 26 Nov, 2006, at 00:44, grduprey@mchsi.com wrote: > But then he likes the RD-1, which also has a LCD acreen, which you > have to fold out to see, it has manual wind, which just about > everyone who has used it hates or feels it is poor for a digital > camera, it has limited manually selected frame lines, and from the > reports I have seen very poor reliability.