Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 1:55 PM -0700 11/17/06, GREG LORENZO wrote: >David Keenan writes in part: > >> As a former owner of an M8, I maintain that the M8 is already a failure. >> >> All the claptrap that I read about the M8 being "a real M camera" is just >> that, claptrap. It may walk like a duck but it doesn't quack like one. >> >> Shades of the M5... >> >> This not from some old fart, film traditionalist either. I longed for a >> digital M but it's back to film and, when appropriate, my now much >> morehighly appreciated R-D1. >> >> This will be expounded apon in my upcoming "M8 Manifesto". >> > >Well at least you used yours for a few days (I presume). > >What did you sell it for? > >Post you're "M8 Manifesto" here as I for one would be interested in >reading it. Some images would also be nice. > >BTW, anyone who dislikes the M5 probably never used one. > >Greg J. Lorenzo >Calgary, Alberta Used one. Wasn't happy. Sold it; got an M4-2 for it. REALLY wasn't happy. Luckily I still had M4's. If anyone feels a desparate need to part with an M8, call me. I want one with good IR sensitivity. -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com