Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] NYC
From: henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)
Date: Thu Nov 16 09:24:19 2006
References: <DC4B73A4105FCE4FAE0CEF799BF84B36013F1C78@case-email>

At 9:24 AM -0500 11/16/06, David Rodgers wrote:
>I bought a CV15 just after they became available. Just after the
>purchase I used it extensively for an outdoor project in very bright
>light. It didn't perform well. I became disenchanted with the lens. I
>didn't use it again for a long time. The next time I used it was for a
>series of interior shots in subdued light. The results were much better.
>
>
>I attribute my poor early results to the fact that I'd stopped down
>considerably (I think most shots were at f16) and diffraction came into
>play. Now, I try not to use it stopped down beyond f8. I just wonder if
>anyone else has had similar experiences.
>
>daveR

The 15 and 12 are definitely better at f/5.6 and 8 than at smaller 
apertures. Since fine detail is often important in shots taken with 
these lenses the significant loss in resolution at f/16 just kills a 
lot of these shots.

-- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com

In reply to: Message from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] NYC)