Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] 2500 ISO
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Wed Nov 8 06:38:16 2006
References: <380-220061127153735827@M2W013.mail2web.com> <7CD82222-DA1B-4CA1-8232-6C70E6C031FF@charter.net> <D5B4F5FB-DA18-44D3-BDD1-0DF29FB832C8@mac.com> <45510D11.60803@waltjohnson.com>
 
I'm not sure what you mean Walt. I'm referring to the actual .dng  
files from the camera which have been offered by a few folks. I've  
downloaded 8 originals offered by a number of folks. I'm looking at  
the actual RAW .dng files from the camera. And 160 and 320 the files  
look quite spectacular; more natural and finer detail than my 5D  
files. At 640, 1250 and 2500 the 5D files sprint far ahead of the M8  
files.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com



On Nov 7, 2006, at 4:47 PM, Walt Johnson wrote:

> On line George? That really shouldn't cut it.  :-(
Replies: Reply from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
 In reply to: Message from telyt at earthlink.net (telyt@earthlink.net) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)