Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]An excellent point. Now that Leica M cameras have entered the digital age, it's probably time to evaluate them in terms of computers and other electronic devices--not lifetime investment in great pictures. What is the expected lifespan of the camera? Probably at least five years. After that time it will become either technologically obsolete, or develop electronic quirks (like my ageing computer)that will render it unsuitable for reliable work. Will it take pictures that would be difficult/impossible to get with a different digital camera? Probably yes, since the basic virtues of the M camera are intact. No clacking mirror, constant view of subject. Do I shoot enough to justify the expense of $1000+ per year to amortize camera investment? Personally, no--but most professionals could amortize the cost, particularly with film savings. One of the old justifications for a Leica was that it was built to last a lifetime, with proper care. Leica also supported cameras with parts and service well past any reasonable period--decades, in many cases. And an old model could often be upgraded to the latest features (at least in the screwmount era.) Now it's a different game. A digital M is still a unique and (from all accounts) incredible instrument, but the new economics of photography mean that we can't justify a purchase as a lifetime purchase (unless, of course, we anticipate a vastly truncated shooting career.) And since I fully expect to see Ted and Tom posting great images into the 2020s, there's no excuse for any of us! Best, Jim Shulman Bryn Mawr, PA PS. A thought: can you imagine any of Kyle's goth models in 2020? Happy Halloween!!!