Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/10/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] M8 and the Future
From: Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie)
Date: Thu Oct 26 00:11:34 2006
References: <c4b.629c076.3270021c@aol.com> <22c93b290610241841k2d1d1d24xa9ce1a9482b3ccc4@mail.gmail.com> <9376F541-A7F5-4BEF-ACB3-5965B7AD3523@steveunsworth.co.uk> <22c93b290610251447k3dfb4b0fgec061c3e0f52bbaa@mail.gmail.com>
I read that Canon sold 250,000 EOS 350D per month. That is more than
the total Leica M3 production, the highest published production model
Leica ever. Canon can amortise the development cost over tens of
thousands more units. They will always be cheaper.
Frank
On 25 Oct, 2006, at 22:47, Matt Powell wrote:
> Even in the M6 days, you were party of a tiny minority, right? 1 Leica
> sold for every 100 good Canon bodies.
Replies:
Reply from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:M8 and the Future)
In reply to:
Message from Afterswift at aol.com (Afterswift@aol.com) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Message from wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Message from wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)