Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Show me where Canon and Nikon's Professional equipment has gotten cheaper. It's still over $4000 for a pro Nikon (okay so the D1x's were $5500) over $7000 for the top of the line Canon - are you comparing a 5D body to a 1Ds Mk II??? The pro lenses are also the same price they always have been or higher. Nikon's 70-200 VR is $1700 replacing an 80-200 that was $1100. How is a crap 75-300 lens great for low light performance? While I agree the 5D image quality is outstanding, you cannot compare this assembly line camera to a hand built camera. And I'm sure IF Leica could produce 100,000 M8's a year the prices would be cheaper but that ain't happening. I could be wrong but I do not think you can get a 5D + crap lens and get $620 off. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Powell" Subject: Re: [Leica] M8 and the Future > The M8 appears to be a lovely camera, and it isn't even as overpriced > as I might have expected... but. As of today, I can run down to my > local Costco, pick up a Canon 5d and some crappy cheap lens (75-300, I > think), and eventually get it down to $2450 after $620 in rebates. Or > do it Amazon style if I don't want to pay tax. That's full-frame, > excellent image quality, great low-light performance, even Leica > lenses if I want 'em, for half of an M8. > > Nikon's/Canon's prices will only get cheaper - and Leica is once more > in a position of being twice as expensive as the 'pro' competition. I > don't expect a new epoch of anything when you can buy a new M or half > of a Hyundai. > > -- > MP