Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If you see my latest post about Micro Nikkors and F3's you might rethink throwing figures around as you did. Sorry about the Misspelling, sometimes my computer isn't that darn smart. Sometimes, I'm not that smart...Hell, sometimes I'm in good company, right?. Now...you telling me anything at all about using cameras, making photographs or rubbing up next to the visual world seems a bit ludicrous. If you think that is an overstatement I'll start passing out free legal advice. Next, I'll send you snippy notes every time some dirt bag lawyer advertises on Television... /*"We want to sell you a back injury"*/ Love Walt p.s A Visoflex might make a good substiture for someone tired of playing with model trains. Marc James Small wrote: > At 05:44 PM 10/17/2006, you wrote: > >> Mark >> >> Certainly the Leica system makes close-ups possible. We all know and >> love the excellent Germain (and Swedish) craftsmanship and I'd be >> the first to admit they excel. > > > Walt > > Two points. First, note that my name is "Marc", not "Mark". Second, > the word is spelled "German" if referring to items from the Vaterland > or "germane" if you are referring to some relevant but tangential point. > > You seem to have missed what I had intended to be my main point and > seem to have blurbled in the transmission. A Visoflex makes great > sense for those who do not have an SLR at hand but makes little sense > to those who are heavily into an SLR and find the Leica RF a niche > camera. A Viso set adequate for most close-up and tele purposes can > be had for $300 or so. Why spend $4,500 to invest in an SLR when $300 > allows a similar flexibility? > > Best wishes, > > Marc > > > msmall@aya.yale.edu > Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir! >