Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This is simply a ridiculous statement. I appreciate the old ways as much as the next fellow/gal. But there's no getting around the obvious advantages and possibilities offered by current state of the art digital photographic hardware and software. Certainly many of the P&S cameras today and especially from a few years ago had a sort of dynamite quality in the noise they brought with them. But the difference between using an eos film camera and eos digital certainly doesn't compare to fly fishing or dynamiting. Nor will the difference between shooting with an M6, 7 or 8. For those of you who care more about the sound of a shutter than creating a photograph move no further (and I have a great appreciation for the sound of a shutter, whether focal plane, compur, copal or packard - I have and love all their sounds). I simply care a great deal more about the image than the sound that occurs at the moment it's made. For anyone who enjoys the darkroom craft work and who's end result is intended as a silver gelatin or platinum/palladium print, etc.; there's no substitute; and I can understand continuing with that love for it's unique properties. However, if your intention is to make prints with an inkjet, or other digital printer; I no longer understand a reason for wishing to scan 35mm film. I do, however, understand reasons to continue to use medium and large format film and the scanning of it - the results offer a completely different appearance in both traditional and inkjet prints. I know that a number of you find the smoothness of fine digital files unattractive and prefer the grittiness of film. But that's also achievable with little effort. As a lover of large format photographs - I find the smoothness a plus, not a minus. In other words - the choice is an aesthetic one - more than a photographic one. Much as the choice of fly rod may be. Aesthetically, I enjoy taking my dad's old bamboo fly rod out - but if I'm doing some serious fishing - I'd like a Lewis and Sage please. Regards, George Lottermoser george@imagist.com On Sep 27, 2006, at 2:19 PM, GeeBee wrote: > It's like fishing with dynamite or quail hunting with a flame > thrower. I prefer a fly rod and the circa 1914 Parker Sweet 16 that > belonged to my grandfather for those, and I'm