Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]B. D. Colen <bd@bdcolenphoto.com> wrote: > i have no real world experience with the DMR, Doug then you have no clue how it works or how to optimize its output. > you somehow 'know' that the digital you're using is the best there is Where did I write that, B.D.? Show me the post where I claimed the DMR is the best there is. > and behaves differently from every other digital camera out there. And where did I write that? I'm saying that it not behaving the way Reichmann or you believe it does. Apparently to get an optimum histogram you and Rechmann need to overexpose on the cameras you are using. With the DMR I have to underexpose to get the same optimum histogram. > If you don't want to believe that the world is round as Richman views it, > try checking out what Adobe has to say - > http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/pdfs/linear_gamma.pdf B.D. I'm not disagreeing with Adobe or with Reichmann' optimum histogram. I'm disagreeing with your blanket statement that underexposing with a digital camera gives you a 20% data loss. That might be true on a camera that tends toward underexposure but not true on a camera that tends toward overexposure. Are you even reading what I wrote? You're arguing with things I've never written or believe. Doug Herr Sacramento http://www.wildlightphoto.com -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .