Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: the dynamic range of digital
From: telyt at earthlink.net (telyt@earthlink.net)
Date: Wed Sep 20 08:28:45 2006

MARK DAVISON <davison_m@msn.com> wrote:

> I have experience with three Nikon DSLRs:  the D100, D2h, and D200.

Excellent description of the problem, Mark.  In particular:

> Please note that the poor camera engineers have a hard choice to make in 
> setting the meter calibration.  Setting the meter to read 2 stops below 
> highlight saturation makes full use of the sensor range when shooting in 
> flat light (giving the most accurate tonal detail), but it ensures blown 
> highlights when shooting in contrasty light.

This is why I often use -.5 to -1.0 exposure compensation, to reduce blown
highlights.  Light here in California is often very contrasty.

> Also note that careful metering with an incident meter does not change
the 
> problem.  If there are objects in the scene which spot meter more than 2 
> stops over the incident meter reading, then they will become blown 
> highlights if the you set the camera to the exposure from the incident 
> meter.

Again, a very clear description of the problem.  Thank you Mark!

Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .




Replies: Reply from bd at bdcolenphoto.com (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Re: the dynamic range of digital)