Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> I find the 24 to be just a big heavy lens. Just a tad lighter than the > hefty > 21. > But more humane. > > To get all that compactness and up to the minute Leica lens design > technology. Not that we need all that cutting edge sharpness at the edges > we > are not getting when we're not shooting film. > > > > Mark Rabiner > > 40?46'58.65"N 73?49'31.68"W > Whitestone NY 11357 > > http://rabinergroup.com/ > > > > But today on my d200 I went out shooting for several hours and walked back in the dark with nothing but a 24 2.8 on the camera. Which becomes with the 1.5 crop a 36mm lens in effect. A fun and useful (I bracket my focal lengths) zooms are primes still do what they do best. The one thing they do. This lens does 24. In a solid compact and elegant manor. Mark Rabiner 40?46'58.65"N 73?49'31.68"W Whitestone NY 11357 http://rabinergroup.com/