Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I find the M8 a bit intriguing. I wrote a piece how "film died for me" a few years ago on the LUG. I look back over the last ten years in photography and realize how fast film has gone from what you need to use to make photographs to almost being irrelevant. I ended up selling most of my R system but for some reason that's hard to explain, I've held onto my M Leica bodies and lenses. I still enjoy looking through thousands of slides but find the advantages of digital too hard to ignore. I've become a better photographer with digital because I learn from my mistakes faster and can takes loads of pictures as I explore new concepts. I had a B&W wet darkroom and was OK as a printer but not great because I couldn't find enough time to really experiment. Then when I finally nailed a print, it was always hard to go back the next session and make duplicate copies again for friends. Once I nail the print with CS2 and the R2400 printer, I can make as many copies for gifts as I need. It seems every time I spend big money on a Leica, it hurts in the beginning but holds its value over time. My wife and friends think I'm nuts to spend that much money on a camera or lens but to have the equivalent of an M7 that's digital (now M8) puts me right where I want to be. For the past few months, I've been using a Ricoh digital GR. Great camera but without manual focus and a rangefinder, its still a Point & Shoot. I'll be in line for an M8 like many of you wondering if its worth the price. Hopefully the photos will convince me it was worth it. Richard Clompus, OD Ponte VEdra Beach, FL