Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]B. D. Colen said: Subject: Re: [Leica] New Leica 28mm 2.8 ASPH lens > Longer lenses on Ms? Never, ever, in my most deluded moment thought or > >said that.:-) I see the M as a 21-50 camera, with the option in > desperation of > using a 90.<<< Hi B.D., Me too! I've almost stopped using the 90 because I felt I never got the pictrue I wanted that I seemed to always be successful when using an 80mm or 90 on the R camera's. A book project back in the 70's required I do a fair amount of shooting in board room meetings and the only way I could get trhe reach was to use a longer lens. :-( But to maintain my "silence" of the M I couldn't use the R camera's. So I bought the 135mm for the M, used it and as soon as the shoot was over I sold the lens for next to nothing just to get rid of it. I hated every minute I had it on camera and in hand even though it cut beautiful negatives. It's totally not what using an M camera is about! Quick, silent and basically unobtrusive, certainly if one is quick in using it. I'd say the bulk of shooting with a long M lens is the Noctilux 50mm. :-) ted