Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/08/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re:Photos of M8 now D2x
From: leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams)
Date: Sun Aug 27 07:00:43 2006
References: <082620061403.27034.44F054A10006C8340000699A219791299503010CD2079C080C03BF970A9D9F9A0B9D09@mchsi.com><008e01c6c921$78d24df0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto><9b678e0608261827y731aaacfv77b6b9d8a76ad326@mail.gmail.com><003d01c6c981$a3a6ce60$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto><9b678e0608261904q32333f00h7ed47c03b83370a5@mail.gmail.com><C1A279E9-89C2-495D-A1F7-0DFAADBD1DCC@earthlink.net><22c93b290608262116r2682af32rdfdd95cecd11f51b@mail.gmail.com> <9b5af6d44232eea25a2f2feab1e865c7@earthlink.net>
The D200 VF is more than decent. Sort of reminds me of my F100's.
D100/D70/D50/20D/30D/S2/S3 VF's are horrible. How did Pentax get it right
with those little SLR's?
Nothing compared to the R8/9 though.
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas Herr"
Subject: Photos of M8 now D2x
> Funny how the standards for SLR viewfinders have deteriorated so much
> that the D200 or 5D is considered 'decent'.
>
> Doug Herr
Replies:
Reply from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Re:Photos of M8 now D2x)
In reply to:
Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey@mchsi.com) ([Leica] Re: Photos of M8 -- Price?)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re: Photos of M8 now D2x)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Re: Photos of M8 now D2x)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Photos of M8 now D2x)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Re:Photos of M8 now D2x)
Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] Re:Photos of M8 now D2x)
Message from wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell) ([Leica] Re:Photos of M8 now D2x)
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Re:Photos of M8 now D2x)