Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] R 19 Elmarit ...
From: telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr)
Date: Tue Aug 15 16:07:57 2006
References: <69289FC5-914C-4F1D-A1D8-E68F1B011702@cox.net> <9b678e0608151307l52e7999o5291647613ef98a6@mail.gmail.com> <BF22EC75-5964-4FBE-A68C-B68F9964AB40@mac.com>
 
On Aug 15, 2006, at 3:02 PM, Lottermoser George wrote:

> And how do they compare - optically speaking?
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george@imagist.com
>

The first version is quite good at medium apertures, softer in the 
corners at maximum apertures and also softer at close distances.

The 2nd version cannot be used on the 5D w/o removing some metal from 
the back of the lens or shortening the 5D's mirror.

Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com
In reply to: Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] R 19 Elmarit ...)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] R 19 Elmarit ...)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] R 19 Elmarit ...)