Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Another Altered Photo
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Mon Aug 7 11:30:28 2006
References: <BAY103-F40245114A1D947471575108B570@phx.gbl> <934E76B8-7675-48FF-B436-89D0819C0EFF@mindspring.com> <44D7607D.6060608@waltjohnson.com>
 
The clone stamp would be, by definition, an inappropriate tool for  
journalistic intentions in any event. I the photographer felt that  
the exposure required any "work" stick to the darkroom tools - burn/ 
dodge/crop.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com



On Aug 7, 2006, at 10:47 AM, Walt Johnson wrote:

> In all fairness to Adnan Hajj I'm sure you'd agree he is in an  
> iffy, get it done now situation. .Not quite like what we face when  
> doing pretty sunrises and flower close-ups?
In reply to: Message from gcr910 at msn.com (Gregory Rubenstein) ([Leica] Another Altered Photo)
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Another Altered Photo)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Another Altered Photo)