Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 7/31/06 1:41:30 PM, jsmith342@cox.net writes: << If I'm ever photographed by the Observer, I hope I don't have a zit that day. >> What I want to know is whether someone ratted him out - "By God, I was at that fire, and the sky wasn't nearly that red!" or if they just assume it couldn't have really looked like the printed version, and would have preferred to run the muddy version caused (he claimed, and I believe it perfectly plausible) by gross underexposure due to sun in frame. I think these guys should have pretty (unaltered) red faces over this! Bart