Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Alternate Butterfly
From: leica at rcmckee.com (R. Clayton McKee)
Date: Sun Jul 2 17:54:53 2006
References: <44A802B5.10059.444561@localhost>

On 2 Jul 2006 at 20:20, Tina Manley wrote:

> Enlarge the photo and look at his legs.  Her legs?  That's where the 
> transition is.  I promise it's not photoshopped!

Oh, I know it's not actually photoshopped, it's just that if you look 
at the edges of the wings against the center of the flower there's a 
very sharp delineation between "sharp" and "soft" and to me it's like 
a jumpcut in a movie... just doesn't seem right.  In this case it's 
mostly the very shallow DOF and the very precise focus, but I've 
noticed the same thing in movies with a lot of CGI or digital 
backgrounds... so I think it's probably something to do with the way 
the edges are handled by the computer algorithms that just seems 
artificial.  Too much precision.



--


R. Clayton McKee                           http://www.rcmckee.com
Photojournalist                               rcmckee@rcmckee.com
P O Box 571900                           voice/fax   713/783-3502
Houston, TX 77257-1900                   cell phone #  on request


In reply to: Message from leica at rcmckee.com (R. Clayton McKee) ([Leica] Alternate Butterfly)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Alternate Butterfly)