Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 6/29/06, Lottermoser George <imagist3@mac.com> wrote: . > And the above can refer to: >? ? ? ?? 1. subject matter >? ? ? ?? 2. technical craft >? ? ? ?? 3. composition >? ? ? ?? 4. print (or .jpg) quality > either individually or in various combinations. > > The interesting thing about this or any other art rests in that in > the hands of an artist - mediocre subject matter can become an > excellent expression; likewise for each of the 4 points. The art is > in having something to say and the means to say it. So we're back to > the questions: >? ? ? ?? 1. "Why did you make this photograph?" >? ? ? ?? 2. "Why did you use these techniques?" >? ? ? ?? 3. "Why did you compose it in this way?" >? ? ? ?? 4. "Why did you choose these colors (tones, contrast)?" >? ? ? ?? 5. "Did your decisions re: the above achieve your desired effect?" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------- While we're sitting around the Pixel & Grain Cafe talking photography on a summer night, George's observations point to objectivity in photography as the gold standard. By contrast, there is a school that believes that spontaneity, emotion, subjectivity is the way to go. Or does the subject choose the photographer's reaction to it? Bob