Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Last week I posted a portrait of Joyce and Otto here. Joyce wanted a print of it, so I went to print it on my Epson R2400, and the print was unusable. Big areas of her eye and cheek looked like they had huge amounts of rouge spread on them--blobs of solid color. I printed it on Hahnemuehle Photo Rag smooth I took the print and the image file into Keeble and Shuchat and asked for their help. The chap was pretty scornful ("it looks like this had a JPEG original; no wonder you can't get a good print") but, scornful or not, he did take the time to help me. He printed it on their Epson R4800 on Epson Premium Luster paper and got more or less the same results, though not quite so pronounced. I left Keeble and Shuchat and went to the Long's Drug nearby, and put the same CD into the Long's kiosk, and printed an 8x10 on their Fuji Frontier. An excellent print, showing none of the artifacts that had ruined the Epson print. So I know that it /can/ be printed, even if it's not a perfect negative. Here's the image: http://reid.org/brian/misc/JoyceOttoMay2006crop2diag.jpg Here's a low-res scan of what it looks like printed on my R2400: http://reid.org/brian/misc/R2400-scanned.jpg It's a close-up from the original image, enlarged to emphasize the problem. If you have a good inkjet printer that is NOT an Epson, would you be willing to print this image and tell me if the print has the same defect on your printer?