Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I don't know that they implied needing "major surgery," B.D. This may simply be a marketing thing. They can't prevent you from using off-brand M and LTM lenses. So they produce a slogan with some built-in FUD. "Use our newer lenses and get better results." How much better, if at all? We'll have to wait and see. My suspicion, based on RD-1 results I've seen, is that 50mm and longer will be fine, 35mm will probably be fine, and anything wider may require a little tweaking to get the edges right. Many DSLRs have vignetting and color fringing issues, especially with wide lenses. If Leica can offer some automatic correction so we have less manual tweaking to do, more power to 'em. The lens information can be also used for color balance. I'm sure you've noted, as I have, that different OM Zuikos on E-series Olympus DSLRs give slightly different color rendition. If a Leica lens can "dial in" its own correction, why not? BTW, great article on the stem cell stuff. It's important work, and I'm glad Haaav'd has stepped forward. --Peter "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@comcast.net> wrote: > They have indeed not said that you can't use every Leica lens ever made - > they have simply implied, with this latest announcement, that only those > lenses that have been "converted" will produce results that don't need major > surgery in Photoshop. ;-)