Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: 90mm's
From: dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Tue Jun 6 00:29:44 2006
References: <042201c688e8$29f01d30$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <001101c688f9$0616ce70$0200a8c0@D1WTYD41> <DAC14AE0-FB50-480E-BED7-B5D9F3C950B2@mac.com> <04a301c68901$4d7a6f80$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto>

I'm way behind you.

I have one single 90/2.0 Summicron from the seventies (bought it new
then). I've dropped it a few times so it's not worth selling or
getting rid of, but it performs well when it does, but prefers to
flare in some circumstances.

Everytime I consider dumping it I pull it out to see if it might have
some redeeming value.

And it usually delivers and at 2.0 at that ... it's a quiet way of
telling me: Forget that Tele-Elmarit you've been looking at, you need
me.

I used to have first version 90/2.8 Elmarit. Kind of long and skinny.
It got stolen in the 70'ies (got it back, but not before it got
replaced with a Summicron). I don't remember disliking it.

I really, really do want a 90 I can have in my pocket though so the
90/4.0 Elmar (or Rokkor) is still tempting.

Daniel

On 6/6/06, Christopher Williams <leicachris@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> Looks fine to me. I figure Jeff may still be busy with 50's so someone may
> need to corner the 90mm market. I just checked and found I have 5 90mm
> lenses!

In reply to: Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] 90mm's)
Message from vintagebill at verizon.net (bill harting) ([Leica] 90mm's)
Message from kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier) ([Leica] 90mm's)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re: 90mm's)