Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]To add to the speculation: http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24359 This site (in French) seems to have good information. Run it through AltaVista translator (aka Babelfish) if you don't read French. http://www.summilux.net/m_system/objectifs_6_bits.html It looks like a 6-bit system that is read optically, rather than electronic contacts. A reasonable conclusion from all this is that the new coding will be used to tell the camera exactly what focal length is mounted, and what the maximum f-stop is. This information could be used for EXIF data, for metering, to compute the working f-stop by comparing the light read from the lens to the light read from an external sensor. It could also be used for vignetting compensation, color balance, and things like that. It could also bring up framelines generated via an illuminated LCD. This could be quite an exciting development, something I've wondered about for years. It would be like having the wonderful, clean M2 viewfinder again, but with individual 28 and 75mm frames also available. It could shift and expand or shrink based on focusing distance. This would give us more accurate framing than the current system, which only shifts. The frame selector could work using the original lens flange, plus one bit in the coding to tell the CPU whether to bring up the large or small frameline of the original pair. Or just use the coding for exact focal length if available, bring up the traditional pair if no coding. None of this precludes the use of old or non-chipped lenses. It just means you'd have less information in EXIF data, and you might have to adjust vignetting or color balance a bit more manually in Photoshop, Raw converter, etc. And for the framelines, you'd have to have a manual override for unconverted lenses. My own thought is that Leica would be incredibly stupid if they made their existing lens base unusable without conversion. And I don't think they (and their new CEO) are that stupid. Especially with an R-D1 on the market, and the distinct possibility that Zeiss might follow suit. They can't afford to lose sales to the existing base of M and LTM users, because that base will be the majority of their sales. So Leica, if you're listening, PLEASE allow viewfinder frames to be set manually, if the coding is used to bring up an LCD-based frameline. Backward lens compatibility is a MUST. Supposedly Leica will make an official announcement next week. Now, anyone want to take bets on how long it will be before a do-it-yourself lens upgrade method gets posted on the Web? Something involving a rat-tailed file, a micrometer, and nail polish stolen from your Goth-girl daughter or girlfriend . . . Kyle Cassidy, take note! :-) --Peter