Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/05/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I totally agree with you Adam... that's why I set the Leafscan to maximum range and then do my processing of the image in CS2. My Epson 11x17 800 spi scanner, the one I use for the 11x14 Eltachromes, is so old that Epson doesn't supply drivers for the last few versions of OS X. So I have use Vuescan with it and scan without setting the white or black points and then work on it in CS2. Except for focusing and multipasses, I don't know of any scanner software which actually changes or effects the scanning process itself. All that they do is work on the resulting scanned image... To me they're just a poor man's Photoshop. Jim Adam Bridge wrote: > I keep pondering this scanning thing and frankly I'm not sure that > doing anything more than just getting the bits into the computer > matters a great deal - VueScan or Nikon or SilverFast - they get the > basics into the computer. > > IF these programs could dynamically change the way the image is > scanned so some segments could be sampled more or it would be possible > to change the sensitivity of the sensors in some way, then I'd think > the software mattered. But that doesn't happen. > > So why use the scanner software at all and just do it in a tool > designed for pixel manipulation: Photoshop? > > Yes, you can adjust the input curves in your scanning software, but > that's no different than adjusting the curves in Photoshop. > > So lots of time spent scanning seems wasted - get the pixels in and > then deal with them in Photoshop. > > I'm totally willing to be convinced this is wrong-thinking but you're > going to have to demonstrate why this is the case. > > Adam