Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/04/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]B.D., is this based on real world prints or 'pixel peeping? Anyhow, doesn't your arrangement with Olympus prevent you from recommending other manufacturers' equipment ;-)? Steve -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+lug=steveunsworth.co.uk@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+lug=steveunsworth.co.uk@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of B. D. Colen Sent: 22 April 2006 23:13 To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:Bye Bye Mamiya The one thing I totally agree with you on, Jeffery, is the DOF problem - and it is a very real problem. But as to Tri-X and digital - as one who used Tri-X for some 45 years, I have to say that when I look at my Tri-X images shot at 800, and my digital black and white shot at 800, I'll take the digital any day. It doesn't look "digital," and it has a lot better tonal gradation than the Tri-X. But again, to each his own - if you prefer the Tri-X, stick to the Tri-X. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.5/321 - Release Date: 21/04/2006