Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/04/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This appears to me to be aimed at the d?cor high end market. But maybe not. It would be bought by an interior decorator to be put over a sofa worth less than 10s of thousands of dollars. We have one gallery in Portland which is aimed at that market. And $1900 would be at their very low end. Might give you something for over an end table. Apparently in an office of a well to do financial-investment corporation; people in the money business or top law office or other such - your sofa should cost so much or you're not competitive your rug should cost so many tens of thousands and the wallpaper in a frame over that sofa should cost so many tens of thousands. To maintain credibility in the business. Peer group pressure etc. So then this Morando piece would not be credible in the high end office d?cor market. It's too cheap - for prints that size in a market which seems to sell by the square foot. There is a NEED to spend a decimal point more money than to maintain a perceived credibility. If you don't give them an opportunity to spend that much they move on to someone who will, Someone in the running. Usually its found in a gallery appealing to a certain market. The Robert Klein gallery is not that market and has the highest reputation in the serious fine art market, It may be the singe most respected photo gallery in the world I've read recently. No d?cor wallpaper in a frame and has a range of price points which you can see on the site: "View by Price Under $750 $751 to $1,500 over $1,500" Pick your poison. If you're dead your work is way into the third line. If you're newer at the game its going to be certainly under the first line. Which doesn't go that far below the amount named from what all I saw. But they appeared all to be farily established artists. Not that I recognized the names but the work to me had strong authority. These prices are not unusual and represent what the bulk of legitimate galleries would price comparative work. I know there are many which delve into a lower bracket which does apply to up and comer photogs or just smaller towns. If one had no interest in such things I've always wondered why make sweeping statements about it? One could have a passing cursory interest in photography and make a sweeping statement that a camera going for a few grand which has zero amenities would be an obvious ridiculous joke appealing only to a certain kind of idiot with more money than brains. To the people with real interest in these cameras and the photography business its insulting but more an insult to the speaker than the listener. The same would apply to people having zero interest or appreciation of art markets making your classic redundant repetitive repetitive redundant statements about that. Paint on canvas going for a million dollars? What a joke! An image in a mat and frame which was done mechanically (with light and lens) not by hand with brush or painting knife going for the same? What sucker would get involved in such things?! People with an interest in art one would think. And or Photographic art. And having a million dollars for an image for their vault or hallway for that price point I just named. I think there may be some tax write-off or something. Or it looks more fun than a stack of greenbacks. There are plenty of price points to choose from in the art world it doesn't take much to check them out and see what might appeal to you and learn to weed out the stupid stuff from the legitimate stuff. A cursory glance at Marialuisa Morando - $1900 doesn't make me smell a rat. Feels legit to me. The program is unfortunate and the limited edition baloney which goes against the nature of the photographic process. The Wall Street Journal had an article I've quoted on the lug many times a few years back that an investment in art; not and offset ink paper print in a frame in which what you are really buying is the frame.,...an investment in something resembling real art even going for 50 or a hundred bucks...from a street artist even... Should that artist remain mediocre your investment would triple in ten years. Should the artist attain some acclaim it would grow in value by decimal points. At least one, maybe two. And should that artist happen to croak your investment then shoots up many more decimal points. This wall street journal article said the best INVESTMENT BAR NONE including real estate or whatever bonds is an investment in ART. Which means it didn't come off a offset press a thousand per minute on shiny paper. Did I say that already? Or that granny did the highlights with a small brush and white Titanium Dioxide White paint on the black velvet canvas and junior drew the spots on the dog with earth color pigments out of the front yard. Plus you get something which might look nice or at least interesting on a wall somewhere in your house of office even. Or RV. Or your light proof humidity controlled vault. In your RV. And you can brag to your friends... Fool the burglars.... Someone's money in a house can be tied up in an innocuous drawing hanging on a wall at the top of a staircase in a bland frame. Enough to buy several thousand VCR's. Gets passed over. Would not look good over the burglars TV table. Mark Rabiner, Photographer, Wanderer, Mover and Groover. Studio-Residence Phone: 503.221.0301 Cellphone I have with me half the time: 503.515.5565 1905 Not after May 1. As I'm skipping out to the east coast. Will be on the road the whole of May as they fix up and sell my house and belongings. Website in flux but there's hope: www.rabinergroup.com A big email guy: mark@rabinergroup.com even on the road. The Cellphone also will be in full swing on the road. The website updated daily in May on the road with all waitresses, breakfast plates and "Travels with Elmo". Mark