Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/04/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I must be looking at a different set What I see is a opening shot from an airplane. After landing, a car ride (next 3 shots) Then a walk in a concrete park ("I LOVE SWIS...") Then ending shot at the waiting lounge at the airport. http://www.kellymcerlean.com/geneva%5Bphoto%5D.htm There is definitely a Beginning, a Middle and an End from what I can tell. Pretty bleak day you had in Geneva, Kelly. Thanks for posting. I rather enjoy the series. - Phong -----Original Message----- >From: SonC@aol.com >For example, I don't see why the two women, the beat up car, the guy in the > >train, and the guy fixing his shoe are in the set. None of those seem >related to each other, or to the set. > >The three airplane included shots, have only that in common, (maybe >Number >one and the last one can be considered formal composition, but the >falling-in >walls detract from the airplanes, and kinda bring them into a twin-towers >concept that doesn't make me too happy. > >The empty train car and the ATM/ticket machines or whatever they are, are a > >little more successful, though neither get you to a place. The unbalanced >composition and mixed light throw me on the machines. It would be better >without > the girl, the empty car would be better with one person besides the >motorman. > >That leaves the shadow figure, the moving people and the escalator, all of >which say transportation, somehow, but don't intrigue me. > >All in all, you need to think of a photo essay just like you do a film. >Establish, Medium shot, close-up, cutaway or reaction, reestablish, etc. > >Beginning, Middle End. That's what is missing here. Also a relationship >to >Geneva.