Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/04/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ted - I guess it depends on what you're looking for in a picture. Seems we have different criteria. For me the subject matter has always come a very distant second to the aesthetic. In the second picture, sure, we see the face - and I don't mean to diminish the importance of that - and there is nice light. But the face simply isn't interesting enough to hold my eye. Maybe if the subject had some eye contact with the viewer, or we could see more of his eyes... who knows. The fact is that it doesn't hold me. However, in the first shot we have a simply outstanding composition. The poise of the subject: focused, studying, waiting. The trees on the horizon perfectly placed to offer us an objective for the subject's focus, they also become the subject themselves of the picture-within-a-picture that is the observation window. And then there's that wonderful circle of light from his cuff, down his arm to his collar and hat. And the line of his cheek. And the confident grasp of his hand. It's a very good picture. I hope this brief note answers your question. Do you think it's a bad picture? P. ******* Paul Hardy Carter www.paulhardycarter.com +44 (0)20 7871 7553 ******* On 6 Apr 2006, at 16:54, Ted Grant wrote: > > Paul I'm not sure why you could say that? Would you mind explaining as > a photograph you think number one is better than the second as > portarit type photo with such beautiful light an his face? Certainly > compared to the back of his head holding a camera pointing out a hole > in the wall? > > Much appreciated if you would, thank you. > ted