Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 08:00 PM 3/30/06 -0600, Jeffery Smith wrote: >I meant COSINA Voigtlander (Bessa R2C). I got my Contax Iia + 50/2 lens for >$400, which was pretty good considering that it hadn't been banged around. >Although they are about the same size, the Contax feels much smaller in my >hands than the similar Nikon S2. And I have to admit that I like the *zip* >of the metal shutter. ;-) Jeffrey Nothing sounds quite like a Contax S or D with all of its many gears whirring about when the shutter is released, but I do acknowledge the joy of the slick sound and feel of a IIa or IIIa Contax. As I have gotten older, I tend to fall back, and so my regular picture-taking cameras are a Leica IIIc, a Contax II, and a Rolleiflex Automat, all from a decade or so of birth. When I postively MUST get the picture, of course I take an M6 and my Rolleiflex 2.8GX and probably a couple of Hasselblad cameras as well -- my 2000 FC/M with a converted 2.8/18cm CZJ Sonnar T makes a most magnificent portrait lens though from a distance, mind you! A Contax II with a CZJ 2.8/3.5cm or 35mm Biogon or a 1.5/5cm or 50mm Sonnar is an epic instrument and a great way to learn basic and advanced and REALLY advanced photography. The same can be said of that Leica IIIc, but then I tend to use CZJ or Soviet lenses on it, though I do desperately admire the texture of the 2/5cm Summitar, my very first Leitz lens from all of those years ago. There are other system cameras worth exploring and which now come up cheap on eBay. Premier among these are the Zeiss Ikon Contaflex and Kodak Retina RF lines, and these are really worthy of great respect, as they were intended for advanced amatuer and professional work. Neither system is as rugged as is a Contax or a Leica TM camera, but they are still resolute and determined workers and have lots of auxiliary bells-and-whistles available -- I have had grand fun with a Retina IIc and IIIc with different optics, one with Rodenstock and the other with Schneider, and with a bunch of auxiliary lenses, and damned if they aren't both fun to play with and capable of great results but, then, so is my Contaflex Super BC with ITS ausxiliary lenses. Finally, there is the East German Werra, one of the very few cameras actually made by Carl Zeiss Jena. This was a product of the old Zeiss binocular works at Eisfeld (today, the site of Docter Optic Technologies though I believe the name has been changed since it was reabsorbed by Zeiss), and the best of the line, in my mind, is the Werra III which can be had for a pittance and some of them come with a Prestor RVS leaf shutter with a top end of 1/750", a record at the time. And it whirs and clicks with the best of them and is a most capable camera but, then, what more could ever be expected from the factory which produced the 8x,21mm folding TURMON monocular, still in production today and in its 85th year of production. (Boeing has been bending and grinding in glee over the announcement some years back that the B-52H was intended to remain in service until 2040, giving that late model a service life of some 78 years. Rodinal and the TURMON can teach Boeing something about longevity!) Of course, over on the IDCC, we have guys still doing mercury-vapor processing with cameras made in the 1860's, so maybe my love of my my 1930's and 1940's and 1950's camera gear is really not all that odd? Waddya think? Marc msmall@aya.yale.edu Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir! NEW FAX NUMBER: +540-343-8505