Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 35/3.5 Elmar, Wartime lens?
From: msmall at infionline.net (Marc James Small)
Date: Mon Mar 27 20:45:36 2006
References: <20060328015620.42238.qmail@web32812.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060328015620.42238.qmail@web32812.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

At 09:19 PM 3/27/06 -0500, Don Dory wrote:
>Bill,
>This was Leica's first attempt at a 35mm lens.  It is adequate at best,
>soft, flare prone, curvature of field, astigmatism, coma and probably not
>coated unless it was one coated during the war for official use.

Or unless it was coated Postwar.  Leitz and a lot of other houes offered
coating sevices for cheap into the 1960's.  The problem is that Leitz used
a wete-coating technology until they were afforded access to the Zeiss
process in 1960/  The posible upside is that  teh lens might well have been
coated by Zeiss, Schneiider, or Voigtl?nder, all of wihich offered the
proper vacuum-coating technique to deprived owneers of Leitz lenses from
1948 unto the 1960's.  

Marc


msmall@aya.yale.edu 
Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir!

NEW FAX NUMBER:  +540-343-8505





Replies: Reply from wrs111445 at yahoo.com (Bill Smith) ([Leica] 35/3.5 Elmar, Wartime lens?)
Reply from wrs111445 at yahoo.com (Bill Smith) ([Leica] 35/3.5 Elmar, Wartime lens?)
In reply to: Message from wrs111445 at yahoo.com (Bill Smith) ([Leica] 35/3.5 Elmar, Wartime lens?)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] 35/3.5 Elmar, Wartime lens?)