Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Nathan Wajsman offered: Subject: Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 11: All square > I am still working out whether the way I photograph is different between > film and digital. Most of the images I have made with the Hasselblad have > been on tripod (the portait of Michiel's father-in-law is the only > handheld image in the PAW), so in theory it should be more deliberate, > with more attention paid to the composition etc. Whether that is the case > is for you guys to judge.<<<< Naw Nathan, Hell it doesn't make any difference in your shooting simply because the Hasselblad is just another camera bigger than 35 or digital. Your eyes don't change because it's 2 1/4, you'll see the same great photo moments you've always seen and posted. You'll just be spending more money on film and developing-printing time.;-) It in no way changes how you see. If you don't let it and think you have to do things differently because... "WOW I'm using a Hasselblad!" Bottom line? Sooner, than later, you'll lose interest and want to get back to using a real man's camera! ;-) When I was shooting Leica's and Hasselblads, some days I'd shoot all 35, the next I'd work with one hassy on the left shoulder and a 150mm lens, on the right shoulder another with the 250mm lens, and a Super Wide C hanging around my neck. :-) Heck I used them no differently than 3 Leicas, the only pain in the ass was running out of film faster! :-( 99% of the time I used Hasselblad it was hand held in the same manner as the Leica's without any thought of "gee whiz I better use a tripod for this bigger camera." Sure when I had to shoot a subject requiring a tripod I used a tripod. I also pushed the 2 1/4 film the same as 35 film, never occurred not to. If I needed 800 Tri-x for the Hasselblad I simply set the hand meter for 800 and shot away with never a mind it was 120 film or different camera. Quite often the subjects of the assignment were similar in nature so why would I change my equipment handling manner? It just never occurred to me to make any changes in how I saw, what I saw or how I handled the cameras. Eventually the Hasselblads went the way of the dodo bird and I picked up a couple of extra Leica bodies and lenses. Hey when an editor would tell me I should shoot 2 1/4 or bigger on a particular assignment because they might want to blow it up big. I never bothered, used the Leica's. When they raved about the material later I'd tell them it was all shot on a Leica. ;-) Some never believed I could get the quality from one of those dinky little cameras that I did. :-) Have fun, because if you don't what's the point of doing it.:-) ted