Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/02/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Lone posey - a return to the analog domain
From: jdos2 at mindspring.com (Jeff Sumner)
Date: Thu Feb 9 12:47:09 2006
References: <4cfa589b0602091114y2030a97cqc68d4cab211009f9@mail.gmail.com> <jj5nu1pk6h6uijqs9a601huk8n714gg3b5@4ax.com> <4cfa589b0602091234s4e47e19alc8d98c1524d2759a@mail.gmail.com>
Just as an observation:
I"m loving the discussion of Digital vs. Analog for the simple reason that
I'm going back and forth about it in another domain: Whether to get an
Amateur Radio which is dominated by one form of filtering ("DSP" (sand) Icom
ic-756PROIII) or the other ("Rocks and springs" plus some late DSP, Yaesu
FT-1000MP Mk-V Field).
I should say, I'm AGONIZING about it, and sadly, there isn't a clear cut
"sharpest/best" in the field, unlike Leica. (Sorry, had to have some
content, and pandering is content)
JD
Replies:
Reply from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Lone posey - a return to the analog domain)
In reply to:
Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Lone posey - a return to the analog domain)
Message from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] Lone posey - a return to the analog domain)
Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Lone posey - a return to the analog domain)