Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think that Marc should use whatever kind of photographic technology he wants to use. It's his art, and his prerogative to make what ever choices will enhance his work and allow him to achieve his creative ends. If he doesn't like digital, then he shouldn't use it. I'll go a step further and say that I, too, am one of the people who wonder about what seems to be a shift from film to digital on this list. But, I don't want to get into that. I think that it is fair to say that we are a leica-centric on-line community rather than a strict leica-users group. But, that's OK with me. I think that the diversity on this list is its greatest strength. I am not one of the Alpha members of this list. I never will be. I don't even want to be. I don't often know enough about anything on this list to be able to comment on it intelligently, so I don't. Perhaps I misunderstood. My reading of yesterday's thread on this subject is that Marc had asked several times what RIP meant. I thought that he was asking because he wanted to know. I can't tell a NOOKY from a ROOKEY. But, it just so happens that I do know something about image processing and computing. I thought, as a fair exchange for all the information I have gained from this list and for which I have never paid a fee or made a contribution in return, that I would offer what I could in the way of an explanation. If I have wasted the groups time, I am sorry. But, my attempt at an explanation didn't come easily, and it was my attempt to give the group what benefit I could of my years of experience, just as those who have had years of experience in photography have offered theirs. Barney "B. D. Colen" wrote: > Okay, I wasn't going to post this unless this started up again today...but > since it has....(and all due respect to you, Barney :-) ) > ... > This is perhaps the single most inane thread ever to take up LUG bandwidth. > :-) > Tina is not a techie. I am not a techie. Ted is not a techie, nor are most > of the hundreds of other people on this list who have figured out - mostly