Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: DMR mk II ?
From: director at ubi.edu (Lucien)
Date: Sun Feb 5 11:02:20 2006
References: <20060205135526.16789.qmail@web25507.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
 
Nick,

AF, maybe ?

Lucien

Le 05-f?vr.-06 ? 14:55, Nick Roberts a ?crit :

> I can't see what purpose would be served by an R10
> right now. Unless it's less ugly than the R8/R9, of
> course - surely the R9 has just about everything. A
> DMR II at some point makes much more sense, I would
> think.
>
> Nick
>
> (Not an R user, to be fair)
>
> --- Eric Korenman <faneuil@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Seems I touched on a nerve with this thread.
>> It will be interesting to see if this is the end of
>> the R line.
>> A DMR mk II or R10 seems to be just a fantasy..
>>
>> my subjects never look plastic - but I might be..
>> Eric
>>
In reply to: Message from nickbroberts at yahoo.co.uk (Nick Roberts) ([Leica] Re: DMR mk II ?)