Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Nathan Wajsman showed: Subject: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 2: An evening in Berlin > here is my PAW for week 2. All these were taken during one evening in > Berlin, where I stopped on my way home from Poland: > > http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws/?page_id=8 <<<<< Hi Nathan, What can one say about the reflections but very well done! In both colour & B&W. Certainly illustrates the impact of using different films. Although I have a question about posting such excellent exposures at the size they are? I realize these are not jpegs at 72 size for transmission. However, given the world of the internet is full of SOB's stealing images for their own use and money in they're pockets. I have to say something about the size of your photographs. Each time I'm primed to have a website produced I'm shown how easy it is to copy a picture. Particularly, your vertical reflection photo then print it 9 X 6 inches. No the photo isn't smashing, but it sure could be used for re-production by any number of unscrupulous thieves or publications. I've been told web sight photographs could have water marks on the photographs. Yes I understand water marking, but I've also been shown how easy it is to copy a photograph with a water mark, re-move it and the 9X6 print looked pretty good. Copying has crossed my mind any number of times while looking at some of your photography because it's so dang good! But this is the first time I've made a point of it because the Berlin pictures warrant the warning. It's been my understanding if one posts a picture through the internet the resolution should never be any greater than 72. In your case the size shows 240. So in the future, certainly with some of your work looking so professionally acceptable, maybe it's time to make 'em 72 from now on. I trust this is of some use. ted Ted Grant Photography Limited 1817 Feltham Road Victoria BC V8N 2A4 250-477-2156