Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 04:03 PM 1/16/2006, you wrote: >You're going to have to explain that one to me. I always though that the >amount of information in low light -- or "shadow detail" for those of us >in the Pleistocene Era -- depended on exposure? As far as I know >negative film still beats a DSLR in dynamic range. > >DaveR This page has an interesting chart comparing film and digital: http://clarkvision.com/imagedetail/film.vs.digital.summary1.html And this page "proves" that some digital cameras have more dynamic range than some films: http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/dynamicrange2/ Tina Tina Manley, ASMP http://www.tinamanley.com