Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Douglas, You're right. It's easy to assume that just because a company is big they have everything! That isn't always the case. Many of the worlds best innovations come from smaller companies that aren't saddled with constraints you'll find in a large company; for example a stifling bureaucracy. Any company looking at taking over another company is looking at all business lines. They're evaluating assets, both tangible and intangible. They're evaluating cost structures, business fit, ROI, etc. Sometimes the decisions are simple. Sometimes they're complex. It's not unheard of for a small company to buy controlling interest in a much larger company. Who knows, maybe Leica will buy Canon! ;-) Now wouldn't that make some exciting list fodder! I don't think it's a surprise that Leica is struggling in the digital age. What I find surprising is that Leica continued to do so well when everyone else was migrating to AF. That, to me, is a remarkable achievement; a testament to a great company. Can you think of another camera company that totally shunned AF? DaveR -----Original Message----- From: Douglas Sharp [mailto:douglas.sharp@gmx.de] Not to sure about that Javier, If I remember rightly, Leica, Schott and co still have some pretty secret glass mixtures on the stove, I believe they are also front runners in the production of cast (moulded) asphericals too, add this to their custom built design/QA/QC equipment and their lens grinding/polishing equipment with tolerances measured in angstrom units, there does seem to be quite a bit of stuff worth having.