Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/12/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Javier Perez wrote: > Huh? > Who told you they make better lenses than Leitz? > L lenses are inferior to Leitz lenses (and Zeiss lenses) > both optically and mechanically. They may occasionally make a lens that > MTFs better, but they pay for it in other ways. They still can't compete > in the extreme WA area and my old 1966 90 Elmarit R makes better pics than > any L zoom! Even the Japanese made Leica zooms are easily as good as L zooms. > As for L primes, you pay for speed not image quality. Sorry but L glass > represents a triumph of astute marketing, not quality or design. Bofff ! I look at a Leica take-over / buy-out by Canon as essentially a good thing. Without such a move, I fear that Leica cannot possibly survive the next couple of years. Anyway, though I believe that the best of Leica optics are truly the very best, Leica is so far behind in the digital race, that I think they stand no chance of survival on their own. Even among the loyal hard core fans, much of the disposable cash is diverted into digital photography. And I like Canon and their L lenses. - Phong