Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] m4 question
From: bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Thu Sep 15 13:10:27 2005

Ah, the eternal question - is it 'better' to have those smooth-as-buttah
brass gears that become ever more smooth as they break in - until they wear
out - or those crass steel gears that are never as smooth, but keep on
clicking and clicking and clicking.:-)


On 9/15/05 3:45 PM, "Rei Shinozuka" <shino@panix.com> wrote:

> i think the controversial issue is over the quality of the early M4-2's
> made in canada in 1977, whether they were bad or whether all M4-2's were 
> bad
> or whether there was no problem.
> 
> there is a secondary issue over whether ALL cameras made after the
> original M4 in 1975 have the same quality as the M2, M3, M4.  steel gears 
> vs
> brass, other subtle changes.
> 
> -rei
> 
> On Sep15 21:21, Ruben wrote:
>> How would a M4 nr. 1179422 with a Summicron 2/50 mm nr. 2141232 perform
>> compared with M3, M2 and M6 - provided that everything works as it should.
>> 
>> I have never handled a M4 but I recall that there has been some debate on
>> issues with this model / or was it the M4p / M4?
>> 
>> Reason for asking is that I might get an opportunity to get one cheap
>> 
>> thanks
>> 
>> Ruben 



Replies: Reply from ruben at rhodos.dk (Ruben) ([Leica] m4 question)
In reply to: Message from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] m4 question)