Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/07/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!
From: firkin at balhpl01.ncable.net.au (firkin)
Date: Tue Jul 26 16:07:10 2005
References: <42E1A9B1.2040500@hemenway.com> <c26ed9441833d70bb618642616351de9@ncable.net.au> <42E1CF2C.9040508@planet.nl> <fe9cdb2c8d3c2567b13074b875800f90@ncable.net.au> <9b678e050726015474baa93f@mail.gmail.com>
Yes, I was surprised to find it in 120, but thought like you: now I need a
red filter for the Bessa ii ;-)
Don Dory writes:
> A good IR film in 120? Hmmmm, I haven't used the Texas Leica in quite
> a few months, but a 6X9 IR image could be stunning.
>
> Unique photo needs some more money I hear.
>
> Don
> don.dory@gmail.com
Alastair Firkin
www.afirkin.com
www.familyofman2.com
In reply to:
Message from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!)
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!)
Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!)
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!)