Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/07/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Curious about enlargements made by LUG forum members
From: firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin)
Date: Tue Jul 12 06:43:14 2005
References: <42CFB499.2040408@adrenaline.com> <5aaa1e79575e794fa301373298f289ed@ncable.net.au> <42D267A5.4020402@adrenaline.com> <d48b98be5b29a532ac17603c67c8cf3d@ncable.net.au> <6f208b1742ab3455a4d7cf00814dacbb@interlink.es>
On 12/07/2005, at 3:55 PM, Luis Miguel Casta?eda wrote:
> On 12 de jul de 2005, at 6:31, Alastair Firkin wrote:
>
>> These comments were for most negs, admitting that with conditions
>> being "right" (and by that I like to think using Leica lenses ;-) )
>> one can make larger prints.
>
> As far as you're not cropping the frame, 35mm can be enlarged even
> more with fine results, I have a couple of 16x12 prints from 35mm
> where grain isn't an issue. If we're talking about tonality in B&W,
> the larger the better.
>
> BTW, limiting 6x6 to 15" doesn't fit in proportion with the 11" stated
> for a 35mm format. :-?
Correct, he admits that, but has an explanation: beyond that the 11" 35
print looks better ;-)
Alastair
Replies:
Reply from lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda) ([Leica] Curious about enlargements made by LUG forum members)
In reply to:
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Curious about enlargements made by LUG forum members)
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] Curious about enlargements made by LUG forum members)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Curious about enlargements made by LUG forum members)
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] Curious about enlargements made by LUG forum members)
Message from lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda) ([Leica] Curious about enlargements made by LUG forum members)