Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] new Puts article
From: henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)
Date: Mon Jun 27 10:51:50 2005
References: <001001c57926$037b5660$6452c33e@symke>
 
At 3:34 AM +0200 6/25/05, animal wrote:
>http://www.imx.nl/photosite/comments/c014.html

An awful lot of sloppy/illogical thinking. Hardly any of his 
conclusions or statements bear careful analysis.

The thing I agree with, though, is that the M lenses and mount are 
unsuitable for full frame digital use as I have contended for years, 
for all the reasons expressed previously. Erwin seems to try to work 
backwards from this position, and force various other concepts which 
are not necessarily relevant to support the result.

Hard to tell what the point of the article is.

-- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
Replies: Reply from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] new Puts article)
Reply from leicaluvr at comcast.net (Tom Schofield) ([Leica] new Puts article)
 In reply to: Message from s.jessurun95 at chello.nl (animal) ([Leica] new Puts article)