Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] new LHSA camera is being worked on but something is wrong about
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)
Date: Wed Jun 22 01:23:49 2005
References: <440b792d050621125331dac699@mail.gmail.com> <9b678e0506211755323be822@mail.gmail.com>
 
Well, I wouldn't say I am upset. Pretty far from it. Just don't understand 
the logic.

I can understand people paying $2K-$3K for a Leica lens to get that last 1% 
of difference.

I can understand Joseph's wish to only buy new Leicas.

I can understand people paying extra money for an a la carte.

Just don't understand why people want to take something out when they can 
just ignore it.

Like another poster suggested, may be if they have requested a self timer 
in its place or something, that would make more sense.

At 05:55 PM 6/21/2005, you wrote:

>Ladies and Gentlemen,
>Why get upset about this?  If LHSA subscribes however many of these
>cameras then Leica makes a few bucks.  If you don't like a meterless
>camera don't buy it.

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please 
use richard at imagecraft.com)
Replies: Reply from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] new LHSA camera is being worked on but something is wrong about)
Reply from telyt at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] new LHSA camera is being worked on but something is wrong about)
 In reply to: Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] new LHSA camera is being worked on but something is wrong about)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] new LHSA camera is being worked on but something is wrong about)